Category Archives: New publications

New publications

Gianluca Passarelli (ed.), The Presidentialisation of Political Parties in the Western Balkans, Springer 2019.

Sibel Oktay, ‘Clarity of responsibility and foreign policy performance voting’, European Journal of Political Research, Volume 57, Issue3, August 2018, pp. 587-614.

Shannon Bow O’Brien, Why Presidential Speech Locations Matter: Analyzing Speechmaking from Truman to Obama, Palgrave, 2018.

Henry E. Hale, ‘Timing is everything: a quantitative study of presidentialist regime dynamics in Eurasia, 1992–2016’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 34:5, 267-281, 2018. DOI 10.1080/1060586X.2018.1500094.

Martin Gross and Marc Debus, ‘Gaining new insights by going local: determinants of coalition formation in mixed democratic polities’, Public Choice (2018) 174: 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017-0489-x

Grigorii V. Golosov (2018) The five shades of grey: party systems and authoritarian institutions in post-Soviet Central Asian states, Central Asian Survey, DOI: 10.1080/02634937.2018.1500442

Karel Kouba andTomáš Došek, ‘Fragmentation of presidential elections and governability crises in Latin America: a curvilinear relationship?’, Democratization, 25:7, 2018, pp.1270-1290, DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2018.1462797

Marcus Mietzner, ‘From Autocracy to Coalitional Presidentialism: The Post-Authoritarian Transformation of Indonesia’s Presidency’, Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia, 2018.

Marcus Mietzner, ‘The Indonesian Armed Forces, Coalitional Presidentialism, and Democratization’, in Robert W. Hefner (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Indonesia, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York, pp. 140-150, 2018.

Daniel Jatoba and Bruno Theodoro Luciano, ‘The Deposition of Paraguayan President Fernando Lugo and its repercussions in South American regional organizations’, Brazilian Political Sci. Rev., vol. 12, no. 1, 2018. Available from http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212018000100204&lng=en&nrm=iso.

Tom Ginsburg, ‘Constitutional Knowledge’, KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge 2, no. 1 (Spring 2018): 15-29, https://doi.org/10.1086/696296.

Marién Durán, ‘Dual Presidentialization and Autocratization: Turkey at a Critical Crossroads’, Mediterranean Quarterly (2018) 29 (3): 98-116. https://doi.org/10.1215/10474552-7003192

Hasret Dikici Bilgin and Emre Erdoğan, ‘Obscurities of a Referendum Foretold: The 2017 Constitutional Amendments in Turkey’, Review of Middle East Studies, 52(1), 29-42, 2018. doi:10.1017/rms.2018.9

Vitaliy Lytvyn, ‘The Stages of Installation and Institutional, Procedural, Political and Behavioral Attributes of Semi-Presidentialism in Poland and Ukraine: Comparative Analysis’, available at: http://studium.kutno.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Studium_nr_8_2017.pdf#page=16

Łukasz Jakubiak, ‘The parliamentary genesis of the French semi‐presidentialism against the background of the process of presidentialisation of the Fifth Republic’, available at: http://www.akademicka.pl/ebooks/free/c014d812cbe20ee2770441d837aaedf6.pdf#page=205.

New publications

Nic Cheeseman and Brian Klaas, How to Rig an Election, Yale University Press, 2018.

Eugene Huskey, Encounters at the Edge of the Muslim World: A Political Memoir of Kyrgyzstan, Rowman & Littlefield, 2018.

Gianluca Passarelli (ed.), The Presidentialisation of Political Parties in the Western Balkans, Palgrave, 2018.

Presidentialism in Southeast Asia, Special Issue of Contemporary Politics, Presidentialism in Southeast Asia; Guest Editors: Mark Thompson and Marco Bünte, vol. 24, no. 3, 2018.

Thomas Poguntke & Paul Webb, ‘Personalization and Presidentialization Reconsidered’, in William P. Cross, Richard S. Katz, and Scott Pruysers (eds.), The Personalization of Democratic Politics and the Challenge for Political Parties, ECPR Press, 2018.

Ryan E. Carlin, Jonathan Hartlyn, Timothy Hellwig, Gregory J. Love, Cecilia Martínez-Gallardo, Matthew M. Singer, ‘Public support for Latin American presidents: The cyclical model in comparative perspective’, Research & Politics, Volume: 5 issue: 3, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018787690, First Published July 26, 2018.

Presidential Studies Quarterly, special issue on the Trump presidency, Volume 48, Issue 3
Pages: 401-636.

Caroline Heldman, Meredith Conroy, and Alissa R. Ackerman, Sex and Gender in the 2016 Presidential Election, ABC-CLIO, 2018.

Berk Esen and Sebnem Gumuscu, ‘The Perils of “Turkish Presidentialism”‘, Review of Middle East Studies, Volume 52, Issue 1, April 2018, pp. 43-53.

P. Willerton, ‘Executive Leadership’, in Richard Sakwa, Henry E. Hale, Stephen White (eds.), Developments in Russian Politics 9 (9th Edition), Palgrave, 2018.

Gretchen Helmke, Institutions on the Edge: The Origins and Consequences of Inter-Branch Crises in Latin America, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Jorge Lanzaro (ed.), Centro Presidencial: Presidencias y Centros de Gobierno en América Latina, Estados Unidos y Europa, Tecnos; Edición, 2018.

New publications

Jenny Åberg and Thomas Sedelius, ‘Review Article: A Structured Review of Semi-Presidential Studies: Debates, Results and Missing Pieces’, British Journal of Political Science, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000017Published online: 02 July 2018.

Laurence Tribe and Joshua Matz, To End a Presidency: The Power of Impeachment, Basic Books, 2018.

Julian Zelizer, The Presidency of Barack Obama: A First Historical Assessment, Princeton University Press. 2018.

Michael McFaul, ‘Choosing Autocracy: Actors, Institutions, and Revolution in the Erosion of Russian Democracy’, Comparative Politics, Volume 50, Number 3, April 2018, pp. 305-325.

Martin Plaut and Sue Onslow, Robert Mugabe, Ohio University, 2018.

Eduardo Mello and Matias Spektor, ‘Brazil: The Costs of Multiparty Presidentialism ‘, Journal of Democracy, Volume 29, Number 2, April 2018, pp. 113-127.

Daniel Jatoba and Bruno Theodoro Luciano, ‘The Deposition of Paraguayan President Fernando Lugo and its repercussions in South American regional organizations’, Brazilian Political Science Review, vol.12, no.1, 2018, available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1981-38212018000100204&script=sci_arttext

Kari Palonen, ‘Politics of Parliamentary Government’, in Kari Palonen, Parliamentary Thinking. Procedure, Rhetoric and Time, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.

Serhiy Kudelia, ‘Presidential activism and government termination in dual-executive Ukraine’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Volume 34, Issue 4, 2018, pp. 246-261, https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2018.1465251

Flaviu Zoltán Muica, ‘The head of state in Romanian constitutionalism – between a monarch and a president’, Curentul Juridic – Juridical Current 2018, Vol. 72, No. 1, pp. 67-77, available at: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj18/recjurid181_5F.pdf

New publications

Sujit Choudhry, Thomas Sedelius and Julia Kyrychenko, Semi-presidentialism and Inclusive Governance in Ukraine: Reflections for Constitutional Reform, 2018 International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, available at: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1197775/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

Yu-chung Shen (2017) Institutional resilience of Taiwan’s semi-presidential system: the integration of the president and premier under party politics, Asian Journal of Political Science, 26:1, 53-64, DOI: 10.1080/02185377.2017.1366347.

Tom Ginsburg, “Constitutional Knowledge,” KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge 2, no. 1 (Spring 2018): 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1086/696296

Berk Esen and Sebnem Gumuscu, ‘The Perils of “Turkish Presidentialism”’, Review of Middle East Studies, Volume 52, Issue 1 April 2018, pp. 43-53.

Hasret Dikici Bilgin and Emre Erdoğan, ‘Obscurities of a Referendum Foretold: The 2017 Constitutional Amendments in Turkey. Review of Middle East Studies, 52(1), 29-42, 2018.

Oksan Bayulgen, Ekim Arbatli, and Sercan Canbolat, ‘Elite Survival Strategies and Authoritarian Reversal in Turkey’, Polity, online 23 May 2018.

Ladi Hamalai, Samuel Egwu, and J. Shola Omotola (eds.), Nigeria’s 2015 General Elections: Continuity and Change in Electoral Democracy, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.

Julian Jackson, A Certain Idea of France: A Life of Charles de Gaulle, Allen Lane, 2018.

Rachel Bitecofer, The Unprecedented 2016 Presidential Election, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.

Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, special issue, Donald Trump’s Challenge to the Study of Elections, vol. 28, no. 2, 2018.

John Street, ‘What is Donald Trump? Forms of ‘Celebrity’ in Celebrity Politics’, Political Studies Review, First Published May 10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918772995.

New publications

Paul Chaisty and Timothy J. Power, ‘Flying solo: Explaining single-party cabinets under minority presidentialism’, European Journal of Political Research, available on-line first: rdcu.be/KxnR

Lubomír Kopeček and Miloš Brunclík, ‘How Strong Is the President in Government Formation? A New Classification and the Czech Case’, East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures, Online first.

Australian Journal of Political Science, Symposium: Majority Formation in Semi-Parliamentary Regimes, vol. 53, no. 2, 2018, including Steffen Ganghof, Sebastian Eppner and Alexander Pörschke, ‘What’s so good about parliamentary hybrids? Comment on ‘Australian bicameralism as semi-parliamentarianism: patterns of majority formation in 29 democracies’, p. 211-233, and Robert Elgie, ‘ On new forms of government’, pp. 241-247.

Danny Gittings, ‘Separation of powers and deliberative democracy’, in Ron Levy, Hoi Kong, Graeme Orr, and Jeff King (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, pp. 113-124.

Eduardo Mello and Matias Spektor, ‘Brazil: The Costs of Multiparty Presidentialism’, Journal of Democracy, Volume 29, Number 2, April 2018, pp. 113-127.

Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Special Issue, Donald Trump’s Challenge to the Study of Elections, vol. 28, no. 2, 2018.

Graeme AM Davies, Marcus Schulzke, and Thomas Almond, ‘Sheltering the president from blame: Drone strikes, media assessments and heterogeneous responsibility 2002-2014’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 477-496.

Scott Pegg and Michael Walls, ‘Back on track? Somaliland after its 2017 presidential election’, African Affairs, Volume 117, Issue 467, April 2018, pp. 326–337.

Michael Chege, ‘Kenya’s Electoral Misfire’, Journal of Democracy, Volume 29, Number 2, April 2018, pp. 158-172.

New publications

Keisuke Okada, ‘Health and political regimes: Evidence from quantile regression’, Economic Systems, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.06.003.

Matt Qvortrup, ‘The Logic of Constitutional Engineering: Institutional Design and Counterterrorism from Aristotle to Arend Lijphart’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 96-108.

Don S. Lee, ‘Executive control of bureaucracy and presidential cabinet appointments in East Asian democracies’, Regulation & Governance, doi:10.1111/rego.12190.

Andres Malamud ‘Presidentialism and Mercosur: A Hidden Cause for a Successful Experience’, in Finn Laursen (ed.), Comparative Regional Integration: Theoretical Perspectives, Taylor and Francis, 2018.

Victor Araújo, Andréa Freitas, and Marcelo Vieira, ‘The presidential logic of government formation in Latin American democracies’, Revista De Ciencia Política, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 25-50.

Yuri Kasahara and Leiv Marsteintredet, ‘Presidencialismo em crise ou parlamentarismo por outros meios? Impeachments presidenciais no Brasil e na América Latina’, Revista de Ciências Sociais. Fortaleza, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 30-54, 2018. Available at: http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/19270/71766

Adolfo Garcé, ‘Hacia una teoría ideacional de la difusión institucional. La adopción y adaptación del presidencialismo en américa latina durante el siglo xix [Towards an ideational theory of institutional diffusion. The adoption and adaptation of presidentialism in Latin America during the 19th century]’, Revista Española de Ciencia Política, no. 44, July 2017, pp. 13-41, Doi: https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.44.01

Sylvain Brouard, Emiliano Grossman, Isabelle Guinaudeau, Simon Persico, Caterina Froio, ‘Do Party Manifestos Matter in Policy-Making? Capacities, Incentives and Outcomes of Electoral Programmes in France’, Political Studies, https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717745433.

Behar Selimi and Murat Jashari, ‘The Role of the President in National Security Policies in Parliamentary Republics – The Case of Albania’, AUDJ, Vol. 14, no. 1/2018, pp. 113-124.

Dafydd Fell, Government and Politics in Taiwan, 2nd ed., Taylor and Francis, 2018.

Marcus Mietzner, ‘The Indonesian armed forces, coalitional presidentialism, and
democratization: from praetorian guard to imagined balance of power’, in The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Indonesia, Taylor and Francis, 2018, pp. 140-150.

Alaa Al-Din Arafat, Egypt in Crisis: The Fall of Islamism and Prospects of Democratization, Springer, 2018.

Jacek Wojnicki, ‘The Evolution of the Presidency in the Post-Yugoslav Countries in the 1990s–the Non-institutional or Instiutional Element of the Democratic System’, Studia Środkowoeuropejskie i Bałkanistyczne, vol. 26, pp. 293-311. Available at:

Peter Reddaway, Russia’s Domestic Security Wars: Putin’s Use of Divide and Rule Against His Hardline Allies, Palgrave, 2018.

Translating Trump, Special Issue of Contemporary French and Francophone Studies, vol. 21, no. 5, 2017.

Edward Ashbee, The Trump Revolt, Manchester University Press, 2017.

New publications

Paul Chaisty, Nic Cheeseman, and Timothy J Power, Coalitional Presidentialism in Comparative Perspective: Minority Presidents in Multiparty Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

Robert Elgie and with Gianluca Passarelli, ‘Presidentialisation: One term, Two Uses – Between Deductive Exercise and Grand Historical Narrative’, Political Studies Review, Online First: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1478929918754500.

Nic Cheeseman (ed.), Institutions and Democracy in Africa: How the Rules of the Game Shape Political Developments, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Mark P. Jones, ‘Presidential and Legislative Elections’, in Erik S. Herron, Robert J. Pekkanen, and Matthew S. Shugart (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

Cynthia McClintock, ‘Reevaluating Runoffs in Latin America’, Journal of Democracy, Volume 29, Number 1, January 2018, pp. 96-110.

Catherine Reyes-Housholder and Gwynn Thomas, ‘Latin America’s Presidentas: Overcoming Challenges, Forging New Pathways’, in Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer, Gender and Representation in Latin America, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

Dan Slater, Aries A. Arugay, ‘Polarizing Figures: Executive Power and Institutional Conflict in Asian Democracies’, American Behavioral Scientist, Online First, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759577.

Ivo Šlosarčík, ‘Constitutional Development in the Czech Republic in 2013–2017: Direct Presidential Elections and Their Constitutional Consequences’, European Public Law 24, no. 1 (2018): 43–54. Available at: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/document.php?id=EURO2018003

Jocelyn Evans and Gilles Ivaldi, The 2017 French Presidential Elections: A Political Reformation?, Springer, 2018.

Ronald Tiersky, ‘Macron’s World: How the New President Is Remaking France’, 97 Foreign Affairs 87, 2018, pp. 87-97.

Riccardo Brizzi, Charles De Gaulle and the Media: Leadership, TV and the Birth of the Fifth Republic, Springer, 2018.

Gretchen Helmke, Institutions on the Edge: The Origins and Consequences of Inter- Branch Crises in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Justin Pearce, Didier Péclard, and Ricardo Soares de Oliveira, ‘Angola’s elections and the politics of presidential succession’, African Affairs, Volume 117, Issue 466, January 2018, pp. 146-160.

Susan Booysen, ‘Semi-presidentialism and subjugation of parliament and party in the presidency of South Africa’s Jacob Zuma’, Politeia, https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-8845/3148.

Thomas H. Johnson, ‘The Illusion of Afghanistan’s Electoral Representative Democracy: The Cases of Afghan Presidential and National Legislative Elections’, Small Wars & Insurgencies, 29:1, 1-37.

Uk Heo, Seongyi Yun, ‘South Korea in 2017. Presidential Impeachment and Security Volatility’, Asian Survey, Vol. 58, No. 1, January/February 2018, pp. 65-72.

Rui Graça Feijó, ‘Timor-Leste in 2017: Between a Diplomatic Victory and the Return of “Belligerent Democracy”’, Asian Survey, Vol. 58, No. 1, January/February 2018, pp. 206-212

Aníbal Pérez-Liñán and Ignacio Arana Araya, ‘Strategic Retirement in Comparative Perspective: Supreme Court Justices in Presidential Regimes’, Journal of Law and Courts, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 173–197, 2017.

Benjamin R. Warner, Dianne G. Bystrom, Mitchell S. McKinney, and Mary C. Banwart, An Unprecedented Election: Media, Communication, and the Electorate in the 2016 Campaign, Santa Barbara: ABC Clio, 2018.

Joel Sievert and Ryan D. Williamson, ‘Public attitudes toward presidential veto powers’, Research & Politics, January-March 2018: 1-6, available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2053168017753873

Jamie Gillies (ed.), Political Marketing in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, London: Palgrave.

Louis Fisher, Supreme Court Expansion of Presidential Power: Unconstitutional Leanings, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2017.

Fang-Yi Chiou and Lawrence S. Rothenberg, The Enigma of Presidential Power: Parties, Policies and Strategic Uses of Unilateral Action., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Political Leadership: A Pragmatic Institutionalist Approach

Political Leadership: A Pragmatic Institutionalist Approach
Robert Elgie
Palgrave Macmillan, 2018

This book provides a philosophically informed, institutionalist account of political leadership. It is rooted in a Peircean version of the American pragmatist philosophical tradition and privileges the study of institutions as a cause of leadership outcomes. The study includes identifying the psychological effects of presidentialism and parliamentarism on leader behavior, a study of the impact of institutions on electoral accountability for economic performance, studies of president/cabinet conflict in Europe, presidential control over cabinet composition in France, and constitutional choice in France and Romania. It adopts a multi-method approach, including a lab experiment, large-n statistical tests, and Qualitative Comparative Analysis, as well as two in-depth process-tracing case studies. The aim is to show that an institutional account has the potential to generate well-settled beliefs about the causes of leadership outcomes.

In this post, we outline the work in one chapter. In this chapter, we re-examine Hellwig and Samuels’ (2007) article on economic voting and the clarity of institutional responsibility. Like Hellwig and Samuels, we are interested in the relative effect of parliamentary and semi-presidential institutions on electoral accountablility for economic performance. We are also interested in exploring the effect of variation in presidential power on economic voting in this context. In short, we are interested in whether institutions condition the extent to which presidents and prime ministers are rewarded/blamed for good/bad economic performance.

To address this issue, we update Hellwig and Samuels dataset, noting certain revisions to the way in which they record the vote at elections with the aim of maximising the reliability of the values in the dataset. We then use exactly the same estimation technique as Hellwig and Samuels.

There is insufficient room here to go through the results in depth. (Which is just an ill-disguised invitation to buy the book). There is also no space to describe how the variables have been operationalised. Again, all that material is in the book. Here, we just wish to provide a flavour of the results.

We find support for Hellwig and Samuels’ basic finding that electoral accountability for economic performance is greater under high-clarity elections, i.e. where there is a single-party government, than low-clarity elections where there is not.

More interestingly, our results also show support for Hellwig and Samuels’ finding that the electoral accountability of the president’s party for economic performance is significantly greater during periods of unified government relative to cohabitation. Figure 1 reports the basic results of our models in the same way that Hellwig and Samuels present them in their paper.

Figure 1    The conditional effect of cohabitation in semi-presidential regimes on economic accountability

However, there are some differences between Hellwig and Samuels’ results and ours. Perhaps most notably, we find that electoral accountability for economic performance is significantly greater at presidential elections than legislative elections. This makes sense. At presidential elections, the clarity of responsibility is likely to be clearer because voters can hold a single person/party responsible for the state of the economy. This is the result that Hellwig and Samuels expected to find in their work, but which was not returned. Using the updated version of their dataset, we now find support for their intuition. (See Figure 2.)

Figure 2         The conditional effect of the type of election on economic accountability

While we are concerned with re-testing Hellwig and Samuels’ thesis, we are really interested in exploring how presidential power shapes the clarity of responsibility for economic voting. Hellwig and Samuels do not follow up on this issue in their article. So, we are trying to build on their work by integrating presidential power into their analysis.

We find that presidential power does help us to understand how institutions shape electoral accountability for economic performance. For example, when we include presidential power in the model we find that there is significantly greater economic voting at presidential elections with strong presidents. Again, this makes sense. When there is a strong president, the clarity of responsibility should be higher. Voters know better whom to reward or blame. By contrast, when there is a weak, non-executive presidency, we would not necessarily expect the incumbent president or their party to be held accountable for economic performance. (See Figure 3 relative to Figure 2).

Figure 3        The conditional effect of presidential power and type of election on economic accountability

In addition, we also find that electoral accountability for economic performance is conditional upon presidential power during cohabitation. In these periods, there is significantly greater economic voting during periods of unified government when there is a strong president. (See Figure 4 relative to Figure 1). In other words, the combination of unified government and presidential power shapes economic voting at elections under semi-presidentialism.

Figure 4         The conditional effect of presidential power and cohabitation in semi-presidential regimes on economic accountability

These are only a flavour of the results in the chapter. Spoiler alert, not all results are as expected. Most, though, are.

We would like to thank Hellwig and Samuels for supplying their dataset for replication purposes. Obviously, all results presented here and in the book are the author’s responsibility alone.

Reference

Hellwig, Timothy, and David Samuels (2007), ‘Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes’, British Journal of Political Science, 38: 65-90.

New publications

Yonatan L. Morse, ‘Presidential power and democratization by elections in Africa’, Democratization, Online first pp. 1-19.

Yonatan L Morse, ‘Electoral authoritarianism and weak states in Africa: The role of parties versus presidents in Tanzania and Cameroon’, International Political Science Review, Volume 39, Issue 1, January 2018, pp. 114–129.

Marino De Luca, ‘The end of the French primary? Measuring primary election impact on electoral performance in the 2017 French presidential election’, French Politics, Online First.

Cynthia McClintock, ‘Reevaluating Runoffs in Latin America’, Journal of Democracy, Volume 29, Number 1, January 2018, pp. 96-110.

Fortunato Musella, Political leaders Beyond Party Politics, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.

Battal Yılmaz, The Presidential System in Turkey: Opportunities and Obstacles. Palgrave, 2018.

Dan Slater, ‘Party cartelization, Indonesian-style: presidential power-sharing and the contingency of democratic opposition’, Journal of East Asian Studies, Online First.

Sarah Shair-Rosenfield and Alissandra T. Stoyan, ‘Gendered Opportunities and Constraints: How Executive Sex and Approval Influence Executive Decree Issuance’, Political Research Quarterly, Online First.

Gregory J. Love and Leah C. Windsor, ‘Populism and Popular Support: Vertical Accountability, Exogenous Events, and Leader Discourse in Venezuela’, in Political Research Quarterly, Online First.

Marina Costa Lobo, ‘Personality Goes a Long Way’, Government and Opposition, 53(1), 159-179, 2018.

Łukasz Jakubiak, ‘Formulas of cohabitation in rationalised parliamentary systems of government. The cases of France and Poland’, Journal of Comparative Politics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 51-65, Jan. 2018.

Rolando Tarchi, ‘La forma di governo del Messico: dal presidenzialismo imperiale alla “parlamentarizzazione” del presidenzialismo?’ [The Mexican form of government: from the “imperial presidentialism” to a parliamentarization of the presidential system?], Vol. 33, No. 4, (2017): DPCE Online 4-2017, available at: http://www.dpceonline.it/index.php/dpceonline/article/view/468

Machiko Tsubura, ‘“Umoja ni ushindi (Unity is victory)”: management of factionalism in the presidential nomination of Tanzania’s dominant party in 2015’, Journal of Eastern African Studies, Online first pp. 1-20.

New publications

Robert Elgie, Political Leadership: A Pragmatic Institutionalist Approach, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.

Robert Elgie, ‘The election of Emmanuel Macron and the new French party system: a return to the éternel marais?’, Modern & Contemporary France, pp. 1-15, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09639489.2017.1408062.

Tapio Raunio and Thomas Sedelius, ‘Shifting Power-Centres of Semi-Presidentialism: Exploring Executive Coordination in Lithuania’, Government and Opposition, pp. 1-24, 2017 doi:10.1017/gov.2017.31.

António Costa Pinto and Paulo José Canelas Rapaz (eds.), Presidentes e (Semi)Presidencialismo nas Democracias Contemporâneas, Lisbon, ICS, 2017.

Rui Graça Feijó, ‘Perilous semi-presidentialism? On the democratic performance of Timor-Leste government system’, Contemporary Politics, Online first, available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/Ah3Y2e6RJFCwnbA4BRze/full

Special issue on Perilous Presidentialism in Southeast Asia; Guest Editors: Mark Thompson and Marco Bünte. Contemporary Politics, Papers available Online first at: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showAxaArticles?journalCode=ccpo20.

Jung-Hsiang Tsai, ‘The Triangular Relationship between the President, Prime Minister, and Parliament in Semi-presidentialism: Analyzing Taiwan and Poland’, Soochow Journal of Political Science, Vol. 35, Iss. 2, (2017): 1-71.

Nicholas Allen, ‘Great Expectations: The Job at the Top and the People who do it’, The Political Quarterly. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12447.

Farida Jalalzai, ‘Women Heads of State and Government’, in Amy C. Alexander, Catherine Bolzendahl and Farida Jalalzai (eds.), Measuring Women’s Political Empowerment Across the Globe, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.

Aidan Smith, Gender, Heteronormativity, and the American Presidency’, London: Routledge, 2018.

Special issue on Protest and Legitimacy: Emerging Dilemmas in Putin’s Third Term, Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, Volume 25, Number 3, Summer 2017.

Marcelo Camerlo and Cecilia Martínez-Gallardo (eds.), Government Formation and Minister Turnover in Presidential Cabinets: Comparative Analysis in the Americas, Routledge, 2018.

Michael Gallagher, ‘The Oireachtas: President and Parliament’, Politics in the Republic of Ireland, 6th Edition, Routledge, 2018.

João Carvalho, ‘Mainstream Party Strategies Towards Extreme Right Parties: The French 2007 and 2012 Presidential Elections’, Government and Opposition, pp. 1-22, 2017, doi:10.1017/gov.2017.25

Sidney M. Milkis and John Warren York, ‘Barack Obama, Organizing for Action, and Executive-Centered Partisanship’, Studies in American Political Development, 31(1), 1-23. doi:10.1017/S0898588X17000037.

Pål Kolstø and Helge Blakkisrud, ‘Regime Development and Patron–Client Relations: The 2016 Transnistrian Presidential Elections and the “Russia Factor”’, Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, Volume 25, Number 4, Fall 2017, pp. 503-528.